Considering response options
Since it's a claim, I want to avoid presenting unverified information as facts. The user's language is Chinese, so it makes sense to respond in Chinese. I think I could provide a neutral response and maybe ask about their desired angle and time frame. Offering to check with sources would be helpful too. I'll consider how Salah's absence could impact Liverpool in UCL and discuss possible alternatives like Diaz or Jota. Also, I need to be cautious not to assert current events beyond my knowledge cutoff in October 2024. So, I should ask if they'd like me to check live sources.
你是想确认这条消息的真假，还是想要背景与战术影响的分析？我可以做这几种帮忙：
- 事实核验：查权威来源（俱乐部通告、赛前发布会、主流媒体/可靠记者）看是否确有“关系紧张”“欧冠成疑”，并给出可信度判断。
- 最新进展梳理：时间线+关键细节+目前最可能的走向。
- 战术影响速览：若萨拉赫缺阵/受限，对利物浦右路宽度、转换、定位球与点球、进球分布的影响；替代方案（迪亚斯/若塔/努涅斯/加克波、埃利奥特/多克等）与阵型微调。 
- 舆情与市场反应：盘口/赔率/媒体基调的变化（如需）。
先给你一个不依赖最新消息的简短战术要点，供参考：
- 风险点：右路纵深与弱侧冲击力下降；反击效率和定点破局（点球/任意球）可能走低；对中场持球与右后卫内收组织依赖上升。
- 替代思路：迪亚斯右置或若塔踢右边，努涅斯中锋，加克波伪9；右后卫内收/三中场增强持球，更多从左侧起势，右侧用埃利奥特/多克拉开。
- 成疑常见原因：伤病、内部纪律/沟通、合同与转会动态、赛程与旅行安排等；需要来源证实，勿仅据二手传言下结论。 
要不要我现在联网查3–5个权威来源，给你一个“真假与细节”核验报告？如果有指定时间范围或比赛对手，也告诉我，我会更聚焦。